Trusted Agent profile
★★★★★
254 reviews across 2 offices and 2 platforms
Keigar Homes has two offices, in Brigg and Scartho. Together they have 254 reviews on two platforms, rated 1.8 out of 5 overall.
Tell us what you need and up to 3 trusted local agents will be in touch.
Keigar Homes's two offices, most reviewed first. Each has its own page.
Newest first, from every platform, with the office each review is about. First names only.
1/5
TrustpilotI’d give it zero stars ...
I’d give it zero stars if it were an option. Real reviews removed that score low or have honest (non doscript) reviews.Wouldn’t really use it as a good indicator of company environment. But the more disgruntled reviews you see the better idea you get of what’s going on. Need to keep reviews up there and inform people if removed and why.
1/5
TrustpilotIt LOOKS as if you need to have been an…
It LOOKS as if you need to have been an employee, or current employee...Of Cancer Research UK (C.R.UK eBay in this case) to write a review, via GLASSDOOR?Under PROS & CONS I suggested (of C R UK)1, Management needs to extract HEAD from A SS (obviously I had to reword it to have it initially accepted by the "system" (that, as I just found out, includes Trustpilot's)And2, That C.R UK download SIZE GUIDES because the BS practice of measuring by hand "Pit to Pit" is a farce, often resulting in an exaggerated chest size, > returns > refunds > lost revenue in postage costs...(both ways) > lost sales.Obviously both the above points come under CONS, and the PROS would be?, well...C.R UK do have a lot of very nice stuff, but as things stand HOMER SIMPSON could do a better job of running it's EBAY side, especially at the HAROLDS WOOD site. D'OHFortunately (for Cancer Research) C.R.UK is a CHARITY, and as such can afford to flush OUR DONATIONS down the pan as they do, because of the way they receive money...from US, ON TAP.Oh yes, and my honest review of C.R.UK (eBay) on Glassdoor? was deleted the next day, since (I guess) it was discovered I'm NOT (or have ever been) an employee of that organisation, or? they just didn't like it.
1/5
TrustpilotA shameful organisation...how can they sleep at night?
Terrible that in this day and age a mouthpiece for spreading lies and fake news, largely by disgruntled ex-employees writing anonymously, so with no accountability whatsoever, is allowed to exist. A site set up to facilitate defamation and liable, How can this be legal in a civilized society?
3/5
GoogleRating only, no written review.
5/5
GoogleRating only, no written review.
4/5
GoogleRating only, no written review.
5/5
GoogleI have dealt with Keigar over several years and several times. All houses are superbly built inside and out ( even the out of sight places ie the loft area). All houses are handed over completed and properly landscaped. Any teething problems are sorted out quickly with polite staff. The estate site is kept tidy throughout development and respect paid to residents. The Falkland Way site restores my faith in builders. By the way, I do not work for Keigar, I have just invested in their properties!
1/5
TrustpilotGood idea - but the execution is a failure
Having read other reviews for this company on TrustPilot, my objections follow a similar theme, but are more specific.I took the time to write an honest, descriptive and, in my opinion, honest review of an interview I had with some other company. It was quite long and represented a significant investment of my time. In my review I noted that I had interacted with the CTO and Head of Talent. Shortly after submitting the review, I was informed that:"We determined your review does not meet these guidelines because you discussed an individual or yourself by name, title or association. We only permit discussion of individuals when they represent the public face of the company and have great influence over the broad work environment."The Head of Talent approached me on Linked In, and pointed me to a news article about the CTO. Clearly this meets the definition of "Public face". I immediately replied to Glassdoor, challenging them to point out which of their community guidelines my review was in breach of and exactly which element(s) of my review was responsible. I received a potted reply which didn't address my points. I decided to give up at this point.I believe that Glassdoor is a good concept but they've not actually built their system the way they could have. To address points made by other reviewers here:- They could verify users' identities to ensure that one person cannot submit multiple reviews. This would deal with a disgruntled employee leaving multiple negative reviews and fake reviews either promoting or denigrating businesses (this seems to be the main complaint by other TrustPilot users)- Anonymity should be optional. I had nothing to hide and had no qualms in having my name published alongside my review. If you're going to criticise someone, you should be loud and proud (feel free to contact me Glassdoor) Obviously the anonymity of employees who are still in the job should be available as well. An employee could convert an anonymous review to public after leaving a job.- There are allegations in other TrustPilot reviews that companies who are Glassdoor customers get preferential treatment on "positive filtering". I also read one allegation that reviews were suspended if the company in question threatened to sue. Glassdoor should publish the nature of the relationships they have with the companies who are profiled on their site. They don't have to publish commercial details but they could publish, for example, whether any commercial relationship exists or if they perform recruitment services. This would allow users of the site to at least make more informed judgements as to the integrity of individual reviews.
1/5
TrustpilotHow can this be allowed in the UK?
Nobody minds honest reviews. However Glassdoor reviews are far from honest. Think about the scenario: you allow ex-employees to leave anonymous reviews about their employers. You allow them to make any allegation they like, whether true or false. These allegations can be untested, unproven, unsubstantiated allegations, as outrageous as you like (Glassdoor doesn't care). You then allow the naming of individual bosses. What do you think is likely to happen? Glassdoor is a platform for the online abuse, trolling and defamation of UK citizens, pure and simple. It's business model requires large numbers of vile outrageous lies and abuse posted as 'reviews'. The more the merrier, better for business. If you are a UK employer REFUSE to give any business to a Recruitment Agency that advertises on Glassdoor.
1/5
TrustpilotLack of transparency
Myself and some colleagues posted negative reviews for our previous company that were not visible, unless you logged in and really searched for them. The company was full of bad reviews but a mediocre review was stuck at the front page of Glassdoor. When contacted, glassdoor did nothing. Screenshots of everything circulated around, but glassdoor - you cannot be trusted.
1/5
TrustpilotTerrible Company!
Terrible Company. Do not allow other companies reviews on their websites unless they pay crazy amounts of money! Our company has an account with them and our ratings went down when we put 10 good reviews on??? How does this work? emailed the company twice and still no reply? Shocking & only interested in clients who pay a lot of money to use their services.
1/5
TrustpilotJoke of a site
Joke of a site.They seem to allow employers to pick and choose what reviews are kept or removed. A previous employer of mine left several blatently fake reviews....they even read like ads for the job! I was even present when I saw the manager leave two of them!!They also take down genuine, valid reviews from staff... I assume at the request of the employer. In one month alone my previous employer lost 6 members of staff. They each left a truthful, yet negative review of the employer. Explaining their experiences of bad business practice and countless examples of the law breaking that was accouring. These reviews slowly got removed to leave nothing but the fake, overly positive reviews written by members of management.How are people supposed to get an idea of whether an employer is good or bad based on these practices?!?!?!Glassdoor bang on about their integrity and how they 'never' remove a review unjustifiably.... Yet its all they seem to do.Glassdoor have no integrity. Its obviously all about the money for them. My advice.... Don't use Glassdoor. Due to their rubbish ethics they make their own website null and void.
1/5
TrustpilotAn utterly disgusting business.....
An utterly disgusting business with absolutely no moral compass. Actively encourages trolling and abuse from anyone without any validation. The guideline are pathetic as is the hateful twerp that came up with this platform. In a world of fake news and cyber bullying, how does a sick and twisted company like this get away with it? Well, it’s because they couldn’t care less and no government body will ever act on bringing them to account. I feel sorry for everyone that works at glassdoor as it is a nasty, spiteful, lowlife of a business.
1/5
GoogleRating only, no written review.
3/5
GoogleRating only, no written review.
3/5
GoogleRating only, no written review.
3/5
GoogleRating only, no written review.
5/5
GoogleQuality builders and family business
1/5
GoogleDont like
5/5
GoogleFantastic build quality and workmanship! Highly recommend
2/5
TrustpilotLack of integrity and declining objective purpose
The company I work for have had some challenges over the last few years. Challenges that the management are pretty open about, that have actually come about from huge year on year success. It's been hectic, stressful and the highs and lows are equal in measure! We have taken a battering on glassdoor from people that felt very angry when they left and consequently left a stream of reviews that have hit us hard. Many points are valid and are being taken onboard but more of them are defamatory, untrue or just plain ridiculous! When we have requested removal of some of the most outrageous ones, Glassdoor commonly state that they have been reviewed and meet their guidelines but aren't able to demonstrate how this process is being undertaken. This leads me to believe the moderator process is rushed or ill considered.I like what Glassdoor represents, but they are not encouraging people to write CONSTRUCTIVE reviews. They are simply allowing people to rant and I don't see how that can be helpful to anyone. I would encourage Glassdoor to retrain their moderators to have a little more depth to their approval and rejection process., otherwise they risk losing their own credibility in the long term as it will become meaningless.
1/5
TrustpilotSick to my stomach - Glassdoor encourages bullying
Find it hard to believe that this company can justify (or even get away with) company "guidelines" that don't care whether you still work for a company, or whether what you post is true.The most unpleasant aspect of their policy is that it is apparently ok for ex-employees to attack / libel and insult senior managers by name (with virtually no proof or checking) and are allowed to be anonymous !!The company my wife works for has been subject to a "rolling campaign" of bad posts and basically hate mail about named managers - when challenged, Glassdoor explain that they don't claim to be "finders of fact" and admit that it would be impossible to determine whether content / accusations are true or false - so the "attacks" are within their guidelines. Oh, and senior managers and Directors are fair game because they decide policy and drive "culture". (and obviously don't have feelings or reputations). I can't accept that it is ok to base a business on lies and bullying behaviour (Glassdoor) with no regard for the hurt and damaged caused to these companies and individuals.Change your immoral / unethical guidelines asap
1/5
TrustpilotGlassdoor allow vindictive employees to…
Glassdoor allow vindictive employees to pose as former employees to attempt to damage reputation. They have no interest in authenticating the reviewer. Not doing enough to stop fake reviews. Glassdoor could be an excellent tool, but they do nothing if your company receives fake reviews. We have had fake reviews full of lies and Glassdoor literally do nothing about it even though we can provide them with all the evidence they need to show they are categorically fake reviews!
1/5
TrustpilotFacilitates cyber-bullying
Glassdoor is platform that legitimizes, facilitates and frankly encourages cyber bullying. Unlike other employment review sites, they permit anyone to post reviews without any screening to confirm people worked for a company. Meaning reviews can easily be the malicious comments of a competitor.I'm in favour of constructive feedback, however Glassdoor's guidelines - anonymity for reviewers but feel free to name managers - means victims of the online trolling are unable to respond fairly. I don't doubt there are bad employers, and generic company reviews are one thing. But giving malicious people the platform to destroy reputations is not unprofessional and down right unkind.
A review that appears on several offices' pages is shown once. We leave out reviews that name another agent.
Brigg has the most, with 252 reviews rated 1.8 out of 5, followed by Scartho with 2.
Tell us what you need and up to 3 trusted local agents will be in touch.
